To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in perioperative care: A Swedish web-based survey
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care/Pain Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion Acute and Critical Illness, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, ISSN 1877-8860, E-ISSN 1877-8879, Vol. 25, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive adjunct to multimodal pain management for acute postoperative care across various surgeries. Despite extensive evidence supporting its efficacy, TENS remains underutilized in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals regarding TENS in perioperative settings to support its integration into routine clinical practice.

METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to anesthesiology department heads at all university hospitals (n = 7) in Sweden and three smaller, randomly selected hospitals across three geographical areas. Department heads forwarded the questionnaire to anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, critical care nurses, and registered nurses with basic education working in perioperative settings. The questionnaire included four sections: demographic information, general postoperative phase information, TENS use for postoperative pain relief, and open-ended questions.

RESULTS: The survey was sent to 870 respondents, yielding a response rate of 28% (n = 246). Among respondents, 69% reported lacking adequate knowledge to administer TENS, and 79% indicated they did not use TENS in their practice. Furthermore, 45% noted an absence of clinical guidelines supporting the use of TENS in their clinic, while 32% were unsure about the existence of guidelines. However, 60% expressed interest in developing theoretical knowledge and practical skills for TENS application.

CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that substantial knowledge gaps and the lack of clear clinical guidelines limit the use of TENS for acute postoperative pain management. These deficiencies may lead to inadequate pain control, increased opioid use, and opioid-related adverse effects. We recommend that hospital leadership and professional bodies develop and implement comprehensive educational programs and establish clear, evidence-based clinical guidelines for TENS use in postoperative pain management. Addressing these gaps is essential for improving clinical practice and empowering patients through greater involvement and autonomy in pain management strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Walter de Gruyter, 2025. Vol. 25, no 1
Keywords [en]
Attitudes, healthcare professionals, knowledge, pain management, practices, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119635DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2024-0078ISI: 001434401400001PubMedID: 40022639Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-86000060020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-119635DiVA, id: diva2:1941700
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2021-01166University of Gothenburg
Note

Funding Agencies:

This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council (project 2021-01166) and the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-centred Care (GPCC), Sweden. GPCC is funded by the Swedish Government’s Strategic Research Areas grant (Care Sciences) and the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Available from: 2025-03-03 Created: 2025-03-03 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jildenstål, Pether

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jildenstål, Pether
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf