To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The myth of the sperm cloud: or why is testes size not affected by spawning mode in seahorses and pipefishes
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8983-2900
Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7108-2275
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
2003 (English)In: Journal of Fish Biology, ISSN 0022-1112, E-ISSN 1095-8649, Vol. 63, no s1, p. 235-235Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

One can predict fish species that spawn externally to have larger testes for their body size than internal fertilizers, to produce greater numbers of sperm as a response either to increased risk of sperm competition from sneaker males, or to counter the dilution of sperm in open water. Using museum specimen, we measured testis and body mass of 95 mature males, belonging to 21 genera of the family Syngnathidae (pipefishes and seahorses). In this family all species show paternal care, ranging from eggs being simply attached to the skin of the male, to completely enclosed in a brood pouch. The former unprotected group is thought to fertilize the eggs externally, whereas the latter protected group has internal fertilization, as the male fertilizes the eggs inside his own pouch. Hence, expecting smaller relative testis investment in the genera that have protected compared to unprotected brood care, to our surprise we found this not to be the case. Instead, all genera showed the same relationship between testis and body mass, regardless of brooding type. New results of ours, however, from Nerophis ophidion, a pipefish species that lacks brood pouch, show that the mode of fertilization in older literature (external fertilization after egg transfer when the male sinks through a sperm cloud) has been misjudged, and that this pipefish in fact, has internal fertilization inside the female before egg transfer. If this exciting finding proves to be true for other pouchless Syngnathids as well, the mystery of the museum data will be resolved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2003. Vol. 63, no s1, p. 235-235
National Category
Zoology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119844DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216v.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-119844DiVA, id: diva2:1943997
Available from: 2025-03-12 Created: 2025-03-12 Last updated: 2025-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Ah-King, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kvarnemo, CharlottaAh-King, Malin
In the same journal
Journal of Fish Biology
Zoology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 22 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf