To Örebro University

OBJECTIVE: The long-term efficacy of posterior foraminotomy compared with anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy has not been previously investigated in a population-based cohort.

METHODS: All patients in the national Swedish Spine Register (Swespine) from January 1, 2006, until November 15, 2017, with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy were assessed. Using propensity score matching, patients treated with posterior foraminotomy were compared with those undergoing ACDF. The primary outcome measure was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a patient-reported outcome score ranging from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability. A minimal clinically important difference was defined as > 15%. Secondary outcomes were assessed with additional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

RESULTS: A total of 4368 patients (2136/2232 women/men) met the inclusion criteria. Posterior foraminotomy was performed in 647 patients, and 3721 patients underwent ACDF. After meticulous propensity score matching, 570 patients with a mean age of 54 years remained in each group. Both groups had substantial decreases in their NDI scores; however, after 5 years, the difference was not significant (2.3%, 95% CI -4.1% to 8.4%; p = 0.48) between the groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in EQ-5D or visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm scores. The secondary surgeries on the index level due to restenosis were more frequent in the foraminotomy group (6/100 patients vs 1/100), but on the adjacent segments there was no difference between groups (2/100).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy, both groups demonstrated clinical improvements at the 5-year follow-up that were comparable and did not achieve a clinically important difference from one another, even though the reoperation rate favored the ACDF group. This study design obtains population-based results, which are generalizable.

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is the most common disease in the cervical spine, affecting patients around 50-55 year of age. An operative treatment is common clinical praxis when non-operative treatment fails. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either anterior cervical decompression and fusion or posterior foraminotomy. The study objective is to evaluate short- and long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior foraminotomy (PF)

METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization, ACDF vs. PF including 110 patients. The primary aim is to evaluate if PF is non-inferior to ACDF using a non-inferiority design with ACDF as "active control." The neck disability index (NDI) is the primary outcome measure, and duration of follow-up is 2 years.

DISCUSSION: Due to absence of high level of evidence, the authors believe that a RCT will improve the evidence for using the different surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy and strengthen current surgical treatment recommendation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04177849. Registered on November 26, 2019.

PURPOSE: Genetic factors are considered important in the development of degenerative spine disease. The aim of this study was to determine the twin concordance rates for the common cervical spine diseases cervical disk herniation (CDH), cervical foraminal stenosis (CFS), and degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) requiring surgical treatment by studying monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs.

METHODS: Patients, aged 18-85 years, operated for CDH, CFS, or DCM between 1996 and 2022 were identified in the national Swedish spine register (5962 CDH, 3801 CFS, and 3131 DCM) and matched with the Swedish twin registry to identify MZ and DZ twins. Concordance rates were calculated.

RESULTS: There were 64 twin pairs where one or both twins had surgical treatment for CDH. The corresponding numbers for surgically treated CFS and DCM were 37 twin pairs and 44 twin pairs respectively. For twins with CDH we found one concordant MZ pair and no concordant DZ pair (MZ probandwise concordance rate 0.12 [95% CI 0-0.33]). For twins with CFS we found one concordant MZ pair and no concordant DZ pair (MZ probandwise concordance rate 0.14 [95% CI 0-0.38]). In DCM patients we found no concordant twin pair.

CONCLUSIONS: In this national observational study, including 145 twin pairs, the concordance rates were low for surgically treated CDH, CFS, and DCM conditions. Our findings suggest that not only genetic factors, but also environmental factors and personal preferences are important whether a patient goes to surgery for this type of condition.