To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Optimization of guidelines for Risk Of Recurrence/Prosigna testing using a machine learning model: a Swedish multicenter study
Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: The Breast, ISSN 0960-9776, E-ISSN 1532-3080, Vol. 82, article id 104489Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: Gene expression profiles are used for decision making in the adjuvant setting in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. While algorithms to optimize testing exist for RS/Oncotype Dx, no such efforts have focused on ROR/Prosigna. This study aims to enhance pre-selection of patients for testing using machine learning.

METHODS: We included 348 postmenopausal women with resected HR+/HER2-node-negative breast cancer tested with ROR/Prosigna across four Swedish regions. We developed a machine learning model using simple prognostic factors (size, progesterone receptor expression, grade, and Ki67) to predict ROR/Prosigna output and compared the performance regarding over- and undertreatment with commonly employed risk stratification schemes.

RESULTS: Previous classifications resulted in significant undertreatment or large intermediate groups needing gene expression profiling. The machine learning model achieved AUC under ROC of 0.77 in training and 0.83 in validation cohorts for prediction of indication for adjuvant chemotherapy according to ROR/Prosigna. By setting and validating upper and lower cut-offs corresponding to low, intermediate and high-risk disease, we improved risk stratification accuracy and reduced the proportion of patients needing ROR/Prosigna testing compared to current risk stratification.

CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms can enhance patient selection for gene expression profiling, though further external validation is needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 82, article id 104489
Keywords [en]
Adjuvant, Breast cancer, Machine learning, Prosigna, Risk of recurrence
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-121003DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104489ISI: 001492946000001PubMedID: 40347583Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105004588252OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-121003DiVA, id: diva2:1957673
Funder
Swedish Society of MedicineSwedish Cancer SocietySwedish Research CouncilSwedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF)Available from: 2025-05-12 Created: 2025-05-12 Last updated: 2025-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Valachis, Antonios

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Valachis, Antonios
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
The Breast
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf