To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Staff perspectives on independence and collaborative practices in the IRIS intervention: an evaluation in Swedish LSS residential homes
School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3680-9341
2025 (English)In: Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, E-ISSN 2673-6861, Vol. 6, article id 1571233Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and purpose: Intensive Rehabilitation Coordination (IRIS), is an intensive, health-promoting habilitative intervention designed to prevent, reduce, and compensate for individuals’ support needs while enhancing their independence. The purpose of this study is to explore staff experiences with the IRIS intervention in a municipality’s LSS1 residential homes, with a focus on how independence is defined and operationalized and the resulting impact on service delivery.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in which staff from various LSS residential homes were interviewed. The interviews were structured to examine differences in the interpretation of independence, the strategies used to support service users, and the collaborative nature of the intervention. Participants were asked to describe their approaches to encouraging or supporting independence in daily tasks and their interactions with quality coordinators.

Results: The analysis revealed a lack of a shared definition of independence among staff, leading to varied approaches in supporting service users. Some staff members actively promoted independence by encouraging service users to perform everyday tasks on their own, while others performed these tasks for the service users due to practical considerations such as convenience and efficiency. Despite these variations, staff reported that service users still have the opportunity to make their own decisions regarding daily activities. Overall, the IRIS intervention was viewed positively, with its collaborative implementation cited as a key strength.

Discussion: The findings suggest that the absence of a unified conceptualization of independence can lead to inconsistent practices in LSS residential homes, potentially affecting the effectiveness of the intervention. The collaborative approach of IRIS, which fosters joint efforts among municipal professionals, appears to be instrumental in understanding and addressing service users’ needs. Future research should focus on establishing a more standardized definition of independence to improve intervention consistency and outcomes for service users.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2025. Vol. 6, article id 1571233
Keywords [en]
intellectual disability, disability, interventions, self-efficacy, inclusion
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-121018DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1571233ISI: 001494459200001PubMedID: 40421402Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105006433801OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-121018DiVA, id: diva2:1957871
Available from: 2025-05-13 Created: 2025-05-13 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Dag, Munir

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dag, Munir
By organisation
School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences
In the same journal
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf