To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International expert consensus on surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Hazrat-E Fatemeh Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4958-1611
South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.
Number of Authors: 562025 (English)In: BMC Endocrine Disorders, E-ISSN 1472-6823, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 151Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been an established treatment option for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but there is a relative paucity of evidence-based guidelines on preoperative, operative, and postoperative considerations concerning metabolic surgery for T2DM patients. To address this gap, we initiated a Delphi consensus process with a diverse group of international multidisciplinary experts.

METHOD: We embarked on a Delphi consensus-building exercise to propose an evidence-based expert consensus covering various aspects of MBS in patients with T2DM. We defined the scope of the exercise and proposed statements and surveyed the literature through electronic databases. The literature summary and voting process were conducted by 52 experts, who evaluated 44 statements. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

RESULTS: Consensus, defined as > 80% agreement, was reached for 43 out of 44 statements. The experts reached an agreement on the nature, terminology, and mechanisms of action of MBS. The currently available scores for predicting remission of T2DM after surgery are not robust enough for routine clinical use, and there is a need for further research to enable more personalized treatment. Additionally, they agreed that metabolic surgery for T2DM is cost-effective, and MBS procedures for treating T2DM vary in their safety and efficacy.

CONCLUSION: This Delphi expert consensus statement guides clinicians on various aspects of metabolic surgery for T2DM and also grades the quality of the available evidence for each of the proposed statements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2025. Vol. 25, no 1, article id 151
Keywords [en]
Bariatric Surgery, Metabolic Surgery, Type 2 diabetes mellitus
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-122272DOI: 10.1186/s12902-025-01961-wISI: 001521241900006PubMedID: 40598146Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105009730845OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-122272DiVA, id: diva2:1981395
Available from: 2025-07-04 Created: 2025-07-04 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Stenberg, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenberg, Erik
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Endocrinology and DiabetesSurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 46 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf