To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nasogastric tube after oesophagectomy and risk of anastomotic leak: a Nordic, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
Dept of Surgical Siences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Faculty of Health, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: The Lancet Regional Health: Europe, E-ISSN 2666-7762, Vol. 57, article id 101411Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Oesophagectomy, a corner stone in curative treatment of oesophageal cancer, is a complex procedure with high complication rates. Postoperative gastric tube decompression is debated and some centres are abandoning routine nasogastric (NG) tube use. We hypothesised that postoperative NG tube removal is non-inferior to five days of NG tube decompression, with regard to the risk of anastomotic leak.

Methods: In this open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial across 12 hospitals in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland, participants treated for oesophageal or gastroesophageal junctional cancer with oesophagectomy were randomly assigned (1:1) to no postoperative NG tube or five days of NG tube decompression. Anastomotic leak was the primary outcome and secondary outcomes included pneumonia and length of hospital stay. Analyses were performed on the intention to treat and per protocol populations and non-inferiority for anastomotic leak was defined as a risk difference below 9%. ISRCTN.com registration ISRCTN39935085.

Findings: Between January 1st 2022 and March 27th 2024, 448 patients were randomly assigned, 217 to no postoperative NG tube and 231 to five days NG tube treatment. The mean age was 67.5 (standard deviation (SD) 9.8) years and 367 (81.9%) were males. Non-inferiority with regard to anastomotic leak for no NG tube decompression could not be shown with 48 patients (22.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.8%, 28.2%)) having anastomotic leak compared to 35 (15.2% (95% CI 10.8%, 20.4%)) with five days of NG tube decompression, a risk difference of-7.0% (95% CI-14.4%, 0.00%), pnon-inferiority 0.30. In a Supplementary analysis, patients had a lower risk of anastomotic leak if postoperative NG decompression was used. Rate of other complications, e.g., pneumonia, were similar between groups. In a per-protocol analysis, the risk difference was-11.3% to the advantage of NG tube (95% CI, -19.1,-0.3%).

Interpretation: We could not establish safety (increased risk of anastomotic leak) and therefore do not support omission of NG tube after oesophagectomy. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 57, article id 101411
Keywords [en]
Oesophageal cancer, Oesophagectomy, Nasogastric tube, Anastomotic leak, Complications, Postoperative care
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-122943DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101411ISI: 001544903700002PubMedID: 40799505Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105012117621OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-122943DiVA, id: diva2:1990061
Funder
Swedish Cancer Society, CAN 1086Nordic Cancer Union, R280-A16014Available from: 2025-08-19 Created: 2025-08-19 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Szabo, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Szabo, Eva
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
The Lancet Regional Health: Europe
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf