To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Relative Importance of Risk Factors for Complications
Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3583-3443
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Department of General Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: The American surgeon, ISSN 0003-1348, E-ISSN 1555-9823, Vol. 92, no 2, p. 353-359Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) remains controversial as studies search for the patient population who would benefit most from SSRF. This study aimed to identify the predictive risk factors in patients with chest wall injuries who underwent SSRF and sustained in-hospital complications.

Methods: This study is a retrospective review of the 2016-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. Data included age, sex, comorbidities, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), injury pattern, interventions, and complications. All adult patients who suffered ≥1 rib fracture following an isolated thoracic injury (AIS ≥2 but < 6 and AIS ≤ 1 in all other regions) and underwent SSRF were eligible for inclusion.

Results: A total of 1823 patients were included in this study of whom 4.8% (N = 87) of patients suffered an in-hospital complication. Patients who suffered a complication were generally older, male, had a higher cardiac risk, were more severely injured, and tended to have a longer time to SSRF (3.8 vs 2.5 days, P < 0.001). The top 5 predictors of in-hospital complications were RCRI, thorax AIS, time to SSRF, age, and sex. These variables were sufficient for achieving an acceptable discriminative ability for complications (AUC (95% CI): 0.78 (0.73-0.83)).

Discussion: Cardiovascular risk, thoracic injury severity, and delayed SSRF were correlated with elevated risk of complications. As time to surgery constitutes the sole changeable factor, prompt intervention may substantially diminish postoperative morbidity. These findings can enhance risk classification and assist therapeutic decision making for SSRF.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2026. Vol. 92, no 2, p. 353-359
Keywords [en]
Complications, level IV, level of evidence, rib fractures, surgical stabilization
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-122825DOI: 10.1177/00031348251363807ISI: 001542271600001PubMedID: 40743442Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105021181819OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-122825DiVA, id: diva2:1990421
Available from: 2025-08-20 Created: 2025-08-20 Last updated: 2026-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Forssten, Maximilian PeterCao, YangMohseni, Shahin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forssten, Maximilian PeterCao, YangMohseni, Shahin
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
The American surgeon
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf