To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Challenges in Follow-up After Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights from a Delphi Consensus
Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Urology Oncology, E-ISSN 2588-9311, Vol. 8, no 5, p. 1303-1310Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) is the preferred treatment for patients with low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), offering a balance between oncologic efficacy and renal preservation. However, follow-up protocols are lacking due to insufficient evidence, resulting in clinical variability. In response, a Delphi consensus process has been initiated with the aim to refine and establish unified surveillance recommendations following KSS for low-risk UTUC.

METHODS: A multistage Delphi consensus project was conducted by an expert panel, which completed four rounds of questionnaires using both open-ended and Likert scale-based questions, with the goal of achieving consensus on four key topics.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 28 invited experts participated in the Delphi panel, achieving consensus on the primary goals of UTUC follow-up, including tumour recurrence detection, renal function preservation, and maintaining quality of life. While consensus was reached on key diagnostic modalities (kidney function, computed tomography urography, cystoscopy, and ureteroscopy) and follow-up adjustments based on treatment indications, the precise schedules and long-term follow-up duration remained unresolved.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This Delphi project underscores the challenges of standardising follow-up protocols after KSS for UTUC. A balanced approach is needed to ensure early recurrence detection while preserving renal function and quality of life. Robust data on prognostic factors are essential to better identify patients at risk of recurrence and to refine surveillance strategies. Collaborative research remains essential for developing evidence-based follow-up protocols for this rare disease.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
European Association of Urology, 2025. Vol. 8, no 5, p. 1303-1310
Keywords [en]
Delphi consensus, Follow-up, Kidney-sparing surgery, Upper tract urothelial carcinoma, Ureteroscopy
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-122871DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.003ISI: 001632600700011PubMedID: 40816958Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105023546459OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-122871DiVA, id: diva2:1991201
Note

Funding Agency:

Cure for Cancer

Available from: 2025-08-22 Created: 2025-08-22 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Popiolek, Marcin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Popiolek, Marcin
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
European Urology Oncology
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf