To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative effectiveness of tofacitinib versus upadacitinib for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis
School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Infection and Immunity, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ISSN 1542-3565, E-ISSN 1542-7714, Vol. 24, no 3, p. 784-793Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tofacitinib and upadacitinib are Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors that are increasingly used for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, comparative analyses of safety and effectiveness have not been performed for their use in this setting.

METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study enrolled hospitalized adult patients treated with tofacitinib or upadacitinib for ASUC between January 2019 and June 2024. The main outcomes were clinical response, clinical remission, and colectomy-free survival. Propensity-adjusted analyses using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), and double robust estimations (DRE) were used to control for confounding factors.

RESULTS: In total, 111 patients (60 tofacitinib, 51 upadacitinib) were enrolled across 23 international centers. JAK inhibitors were used to induce response in 86 (77%) patients and used to maintain response after adequate intravenous steroid response in 25 (23%). The median follow up was 31 weeks (IQR 13-64). Between days 3-7 after treatment initiation, upadacitinib was associated with greater response rates 84% vs.54%,p=0.02 but response/remission were comparable at day 98 (45%/36% vs 55/48%) and day 182 (29/29% vs. 39/34%). Sub-analyses for JAK inhibitor use as salvage therapy (tofacitinib (n=35) vs. upadacitinib (n=31)) showed similar effectiveness outcomes across both groups. The probabilities of colectomy-free survival at days 98/182 for tofacitinib and upadacitinib were 79%/75% and 80%/78%, respectively, with no significant differences in the comparison of survival curves, p=0.99. Treatment failure rates (where JAK inhibitor was used to maintain remission) were similar at days 98 and 182. The frequency of adverse events was comparable.

CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib and upadacitinib appear to have similar effectiveness and safety profiles when used for the treatment of ASUC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026. Vol. 24, no 3, p. 784-793
Keywords [en]
Janus kinase inhibitors, Ulcerative colitis, acute severe ulcerative colitis, colectomy, effectiveness, tofacitinib, upadacitinib
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-122878DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.025ISI: 001699079500001PubMedID: 40721074Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105014978916OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-122878DiVA, id: diva2:1991266
Available from: 2025-08-22 Created: 2025-08-22 Last updated: 2026-03-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bergemalm, DanielHalfvarson, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergemalm, DanielHalfvarson, Jonas
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf