To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy vs. standard dressings in breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsala University Hospital, Section for Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linköping University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Linköping, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Oncology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6059-0194
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: British Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0007-1323, E-ISSN 1365-2168, Vol. 112, no Suppl. 11, p. xi6-xi6, article id znaf149.02Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Wound-related complications following breast surgery are common and may delay adjuvant treatment, prolong healing time ,and increase morbidity. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) has been proposed as a strategy to reduce postoperative complications across various surgical procedures. However, its effectiveness in breast surgery remains uncertain.

Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing iNPWT with standard dressings in closed breast surgery incisions were included if they reported at least one wound-related outcome. Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to March 2025. A random-effects model using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method was applied. Heterogeneity, publication bias, and study quality were assessed using the RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. The certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach.

Result: Twenty-nine studies involving 4,904 patients were included. iNPWT had a modest but significant effect in reducing the risk o fwound dehiscence (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03–1.12; p < 0.001; I² = 81.6%) and surgical site infection (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01–1.09; p = 0.02; I² = 84.13%), despite the substantial heterogeneity. Prediction intervals highlighted the substantial between-study variability. Findings for seroma, skin necrosis, heamatoma, and nipple-areolar complex necrosis were inconclusive. Meta-regression identified low BMI and younger age as potential protective factors for skin necrosis, although no predictors were found for other complications.

Discussion: iNPWT may reduce specific wound complications in breast surgery, but heterogeneity and methodological limitations constrain conclusions. Further high-quality randomized trials with standardized outcomes are needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2025. Vol. 112, no Suppl. 11, p. xi6-xi6, article id znaf149.02
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-123025DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.021ISI: 001550777700001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-123025DiVA, id: diva2:1991985
Conference
Swedish Surgical Week, Linköping, Sweden, August 18-22, 2025
Available from: 2025-08-26 Created: 2025-08-26 Last updated: 2025-08-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Valachis, Antonis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Valachis, Antonis
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
British Journal of Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf