Implications of Changing the Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (CDC4G): A Healthcare Cost Analysis Alongside a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised TrialShow others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ISSN 1470-0328, E-ISSN 1471-0528Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect on healthcare resource use after introducing the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria (WHO-2013) for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared to former criteria in Sweden (SWE-GDM). DESIGN: A cost-analysis alongside the Changing Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes (CDC4G) randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Sweden, with risk-factor based screening for GDM. POPULATION: 47 080 pregnant women and their infants. METHODS: A register-based cost-analysis from a healthcare perspective alongside a stepped-wedge cluster RCT of switching from SWE-GDM to WHO-2013 criteria in 2018. Analyses were made on the population level and repeated in the subgroup affected by the intervention, that is, those with plasma glucose values between SWE-GDM and WHO-2013 criteria. Sensitivity analysis by bootstrapping was performed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated costs for obstetric surveillance (including GDM-management), delivery and neonatal healthcare until 28 days postpartum. RESULTS: On a population level, the WHO-2013 criteria were associated with increased costs of obstetric surveillance (adjusted mean [bootstrap confidence interval]) €94.0 [24.5-169.1], delivery care €20.4 [-33.5 to 75.4] and neonatal care €331.0 [75.1-589.0] per pregnancy, and in the affected subgroup €606.9 [377.7-872.4], €348.5 [126.0-542.0] and €129.3 [-559.0 to 980.9] respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the WHO-2013 criteria in Sweden was associated with increased costs for obstetric surveillance and delivery on a population level, driven by the affected subgroup. The increased costs for neonatal care were associated with large uncertainty. A detailed understanding of the changes in resource use can guide decisions to mitigate cost increases.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2025.
Keywords [en]
cost analysis, diagnostic criteria, gestational diabetes mellitus, healthcare resource use
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-123625DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18364ISI: 001567613500001PubMedID: 40931348Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105015466951OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-123625DiVA, id: diva2:1997401
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2018-00470Mary von Sydow Foundation, 1017Mary von Sydow Foundation, 4917Mary von Sydow Foundation, 2618Mary von Sydow Foundation, 3718Nyckelfonden, OLL-597601Region Örebro County, OLL-693551Region Örebro County, OLL-786911Region StockholmRegion Västmanland, LTV-966501Region Skåne
Note
Funding Agencies:
This work was supported by Swedish Research Council, Clinical therapy research (2018-00470), Mrs Mary von Sydows, born Wijk (numbers 1017, 4917, 2618 and 3718), Nyckelfonden Region Örebro County (OLL-597601), Region Örebro County Research committee (OLL-693551, OLL-786911), Regional Research committee Uppsala-Örebro (RFR-749241), Region Stockholm County, the Centre of Clinical Research, Västmanland County Council (LTV-966501) and grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (GBG-823211, ALFGBG-932692, OLL-930268), Skåne University Hospital, and the Skåne County Council Research and Development Foundation (REGSKANE-622891).
2025-09-122025-09-122026-01-23Bibliographically approved