To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Initial Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Management Pathway Drives Infectious Complication Occurrence
Perelman School of Medicine, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Unidad de Cirugía de Urgencias y Trauma del Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7097-487X
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Surgical Infections, ISSN 1096-2964, E-ISSN 1557-8674, Vol. 27, no 11, p. 59-67Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The Bologna guideline outlines three small bowel obstruction (SBO) management pathways. It remains unclear how pathway selection influences post-operative infections.

Methods: A multi-national, prospective, observational, audit of SBO management (November 1, 2023-May 31, 2024) captured demographics, care, and outcomes. Patients were grouped by pathway (successful non-operative management [NOM], NOM followed by surgery [NOM-T], direct to surgery [DTS]). Intergroup comparisons by chi-square or Fisher exact test, significance for p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 1,737 patients were assessed across 21 countries (850 NOM, 379 NOM-T, 508 DTS). Operative cohorts demonstrated similar age (NOM-T 65.2 ± 17.3 vs. DTS 65.5 ± 18.4 y; p = 0.834) and gender (NOM-T 53.6% vs. DTS, 52% female; p = 0.688). Comorbidities were more frequent in patients undergoing NOM-T (77.8%) versus DTS (69.7%; p < 0.001). DTS demonstrated more intestinal ischemia (NOM-T 22.8% vs. DTS 33%; p = 0.002). Time to OR was longer in NOM-T (43.8 ± 30.6 vs. DTS 12.4 ± 15.2 h; p < 0.001). Hospital length of stay (LOS) (NOM-T 12.4 ± 15.2 vs. DTS 7.7 ± 8.0 d; p < 0.001) and LOS (NOM-T 10.1 ± 10.4 vs. DTS 6.6 ± 9.1 d; p < 0.001) were longer in NOM-T. Superficial wound dehiscence (3.9%) and fascial dehiscence (2.6%) were uncommon. Overall surgical site infection (SSI) incidence was similar (NOM-T 8.7% vs. DTS 7.7%; p = 0.578). Deep SSI overall frequency was low (3.9%) but increased in NOM-T (5.5%) versus DTS (2.8%, p = 0.035).

Conclusions: An NOM trial before operation for adhesive SBO seems to increase deep SSI risk and likely reflects time to OR as well as hospital and surgeon factors-elements that merit specific evaluation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Mary Ann Liebert, 2026. Vol. 27, no 11, p. 59-67
Keywords [en]
non-operative management, operation, outcomes, small bowel obstruction, surgical site infection
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-123774DOI: 10.1177/10962964251380382ISI: 001574144300001PubMedID: 40960934Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105017660572OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-123774DiVA, id: diva2:1998851
Available from: 2025-09-18 Created: 2025-09-18 Last updated: 2026-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mohseni, Shahin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mohseni, Shahin
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Surgical Infections
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf