To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ESMO guidance on the use of Large Language Models in Clinical Practice (ELCAP)
Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, Thoracic Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France; Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
Cancer Survivorship Group, Inserm Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; IHU PRISM National PRecISion Medicine Center in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Annals of Oncology, ISSN 0923-7534, E-ISSN 1569-8041, Vol. 36, no 12, p. 1447-1457Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into health care, with substantial implications for oncology practice. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) developed the ESMO guidance on the use of Large Language Models in Clinical Practice (ELCAP) to provide a structured framework and basic guidance for their safe and effective application in oncology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2024 and February 2025, a multidisciplinary group of 20 experts convened under the ESMO Real World Data and Digital Health Task Force. Using literature review and a Delphi consensus process, the panel defined three categories of LLM use in oncology: type 1 (patient-facing applications), type 2 [health care professional (HCP)-facing applications], and type 3 (background institutional systems). Consensus statements were developed for each type to provide basic practical guidance.

RESULTS: ELCAP highlights opportunities such as improved patient education and symptom management, streamlined clinical workflows, and enhanced data processing. At the same time, it addresses challenges including data privacy, algorithmic bias, regulatory compliance, and the risk of unsupervised use. The framework emphasises human oversight, protection of patient privacy, and alignment with clinical and ethical standards. Patient-facing tools should complement, not replace, professional advice and should be embedded in supervised care pathways. HCP-facing and background systems may improve efficiency and decision support but require systematic validation, transparency, and continuous monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS: ELCAP provides a three-tier framework and basic practical guidance for LLM use in oncology. ESMO supports efforts to use this framework to improve patient care, but warns against unsupervised or unvalidated use.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 36, no 12, p. 1447-1457
Keywords [en]
AI, clinical decision making, large language model
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-124479DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.09.001ISI: 001634474900001PubMedID: 41111032Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105024015290OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-124479DiVA, id: diva2:2007407
Available from: 2025-10-20 Created: 2025-10-20 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Valachis, Antonis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Valachis, Antonis
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Annals of Oncology
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 49 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf