To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The nature of reasoning-and-proving items in textbooks: The cases of Türkiye, Norway, and Slovakia
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Education, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Education, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4561-9742
Department of Teacher Education, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
2025 (English)In: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, ISSN 1306-3030, Vol. 20, no 3, article id em0829Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this cross-national study, we explore the different ways of reasoning-and-proving (RP) presented in three 8th grade textbooks, one from each country: Turkey, Norway, and Slovakia. While the analysis revealed that all three textbooks contain similar numbers of problems involving some form of RP, differences exist in terms of the dominating ways of reasoning. In particular, while empirical reasoning dominates in the Turkish textbook, deductive reasoning is the dominant way of reasoning in the Slovak and Norwegian textbooks, with the Norwegian textbook having a significantly larger proportion of one-step deductions than its Slovak counterpart. This study is limited to only three countries, with only one textbook selected in each country. We discuss the findings and implications of our findings for textbook developers and teachers. Recommendations for further research, considering the limitations of the study, are also given.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Modestum Ltd , 2025. Vol. 20, no 3, article id em0829
Keywords [en]
reasoning and proving, textbook analysis, cross-cultural study
National Category
Educational Sciences Mathematical sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-124660DOI: 10.29333/iejme/16185ISI: 001521392200009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105005883810OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-124660DiVA, id: diva2:2009896
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 951822Available from: 2025-10-29 Created: 2025-10-29 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sevinc, Serife

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sevinc, Serife
In the same journal
International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
Educational SciencesMathematical sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf