To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Antecedents of attachment security in infancy: Attention and neural responses to negative emotions
University of Tampere, School of Social Sciences and Humanities/Psychology, Finland.
University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0208-4212
University of Tampere, School of Social Sciences and Humanities/Psychology, Finland.
ampere University Hospital, Department of Child Psychiatry, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

One of the key functions of attachment relationships is to shape the way individuals perceive and respond to potential threats. From this perspective, developmentally early markers of later attachment security vs. insecurity may be detected in infants’ responses to social cues signaling threat. Utilizing established paradigms from developmental emotion research, we measured attentional biases and neural responses to emotional faces in 7-month-old infants and particularly investigated whether early sensitivity to fearful vs. nonfearful faces is related to attachment security to the caregiver at 14 months of age. Infants (N = 73) were tested at 7 months with an eye-tracking paradigm assessing attentiondis engagement from faces (neutral, happy, fearful) and control stimuli towards peripheral distractors. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs), indexing cortical differentiation of facial expression stimuli, were simultaneously recorded with high-density EEG. Fear bias scores were computed, reflecting differences in a) the probability of disengaging attention from fearful vs. non-fearful faces and b) posterior ERP responses (N290 and P400 components) to fearful vs. non-fearful faces. Infant-mother attachment was assessed with an observational paradigm (Strange Situation Procedure) at 14 months, with 46 infants classified as securely and 27 infants as insecurely attached to their mother. In the eye-tracking paradigm, attention to fearful faces at 7 months predicted attachment security to the mother at 14 months, with a smaller attentional bias to fearful expressions associated with insecure attachment. The ERP data complemented the attentional bias data in showing reduced cortical differentiation of fearful and nonfearful expressions in insecurely attached infants. Exploratory analyses indicated that an absence of an agetypical fear bias in both measures (eye-tracking and ERP) was almost exclusively associated with insecure attachment. Together, these data provide the first evidence linking infants’ sensitivity to social cues signaling threat (reflected in attentional biases and cortical encoding) with attachment formation to the caregiver.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-124754OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-124754DiVA, id: diva2:2010903
Conference
19th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCOP), Paphos, Cyprus, September 17-20, 2015
Available from: 2025-11-03 Created: 2025-11-03 Last updated: 2025-11-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Forssman, Linda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forssman, Linda
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf