To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of nurses towards wound cleansing: design and evaluation of measurement properties of a questionnaire
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Swedish Centre for Skin and Wound Research (SCENTR), Nursing Science Unit, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7862-3652
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Skin Integrity Research Group (SKINT), University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. (Swedish Centre for Skin and Wound Research (SCENTR))ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3080-8716
2026 (English)In: Journal of tissue viability, ISSN 0965-206X, Vol. 35, no 1, article id 100967Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Wound cleansing is a fundamental component of chronic wound management; yet, high-quality evidence to guide practice is limited. Understanding nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) is essential, but no instrument with published evidence of acceptable measurement properties exists.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a KAP questionnaire on wound cleansing for community nurses and evaluate its measurement properties.

METHODS: A multi-phase study was conducted, including literature/consensus item generation; a two-round international Delphi process; pilot cognitive interviews; and field testing in Canada. Knowledge was assessed for item and construct validity; attitude for internal consistency (Cronbach's α); and all KAP items for stability using test-retest reliability.

RESULTS: 26 experts supported content relevance; feedback led to targeted revisions. Field testing involved 130 nurses (83.1 % homecare; >80 % with ≥5 years of wound care experience). Several knowledge items were too easy (≥.90); none negatively discriminated. Exploratory principal components analysis of attitudes yielded three components (63 % of variance); internal consistency ranged from α = 0.41 to α = 0.76. In the subsample (n = 30), knowledge κ values ranged from slight/fair to substantial; some items showed ceiling effects (uniform responses, κ undefined). Attitude and practice item-level intraclass correlation coefficients varied (.07-.95), with several ≥.75 and others <.60. Known-groups comparison supported higher knowledge among formally educated nurses.

CONCLUSION: Evidence supports content validity and a clarified attitudes structure; internal consistency and stability were acceptable for some elements but below the threshold for others. Future refinement and confirmatory testing are warranted.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026. Vol. 35, no 1, article id 100967
Keywords [en]
Attitudes, Home care, Knowledge, Nursing, Practices, Wound cleansing
National Category
Nursing Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-125155DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100967ISI: 001628456700001PubMedID: 41274134Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105022109093OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-125155DiVA, id: diva2:2015880
Available from: 2025-11-24 Created: 2025-11-24 Last updated: 2026-05-20Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Wound Cleansing in Chronic Wound Management: Evidence, Measurement, and Clinical Practice
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Wound Cleansing in Chronic Wound Management: Evidence, Measurement, and Clinical Practice
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Wound cleansing is widely regarded as a foundational component of chronic wound management; however, the empirical evidence supporting commonly recommended cleansing techniques remains limited. Much of the guidance informing current practice is derived from acute wound models, laboratory studies, and expert consensus rather than from comparative studies conducted in chronic wound populations.

The aim of this thesis was to examine the evidence base for wound cleansing practices in chronic wounds and to investigate nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to wound cleansing.

The thesis comprises four studies. Study I systematically reviewed evidence comparing irrigation and swabbing techniques in chronic wounds. Study II developed and psychometrically evaluated a questionnaire measuring nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to wound cleansing. Study III applied the instrument in an international cross-sectional survey. Study IV conducted confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the internal structure of the attitudes subscale.

The review identified extremely limited chronic wound-specific evidence for commonly recommended cleansing techniques. The developed instrument demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Survey findings showed variation in clinician knowledge and practice, with higher knowledge associated with formal wound care education. Confirmatory analysis supported the multidimensional structure of nurses’ attitudes.

These findings highlight the need for stronger empirical evidence and structured education to support evidence-informed cleansing practices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2026. p. 80
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 359
Keywords
chronic wounds, wound cleansing, wound irrigation, biofilm, nursing practice, knowledge-attitude-practice, questionnaire development, psychometric validation
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-127907 (URN)9789175297866 (ISBN)9789175297873 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-06-12, Örebro universitet, Forumhuset, Hörsal F, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-03-12 Created: 2026-03-12 Last updated: 2026-06-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Rajhathy, Erin M.Falk-Brynhildsen, KarinBeeckman, Dimitri

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rajhathy, Erin M.Falk-Brynhildsen, KarinBeeckman, Dimitri
By organisation
School of Health Sciences
NursingDermatology and Venereal Diseases

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf